PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGSB vs. FLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGSB vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGSB achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 1.46% return.


IGSB

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.18%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*
2.74%

FLDR

1D
0.04%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGSB vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IGSB
iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.77%6.96%4.97%6.40%-5.63%-0.56%5.37%7.11%1.37%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
1.46%5.41%5.71%6.32%-0.33%-0.18%2.01%4.52%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IGSB and FLDR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018

0.48

The correlation between IGSB and FLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGSB vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGSB
IGSB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IGSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGSB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IGSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGSB vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGSBFLDRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

5.99

-3.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.88

10.13

-6.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

2.78

-1.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

10.24

-7.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.18

70.42

-57.24

IGSB vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is lower than the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 5.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGSB and FLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGSBFLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

5.99

-3.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

3.08

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.62

+0.09

Drawdowns

IGSB vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGSB drawdown since its inception was -13.38%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSB and FLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGSBFLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-12.23%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-0.47%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

-0.76%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.46%

-2.33%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-0.35%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.07%

+0.29%

Volatility

IGSB vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) has a higher volatility of 0.58% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.19%. This indicates that IGSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGSBFLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

0.19%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

0.58%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92%

0.80%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.93%

1.21%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.46%

5.27%

-1.81%

IGSB vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGSB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGSB vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

IGSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than FLDR's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.42%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGSB
iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.57%4.44%4.02%3.26%2.07%1.82%2.36%3.06%2.46%1.65%1.45%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGSB and FLDR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGSB has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGSB dropped -13.38% vs FLDR's -12.23%.

On 5-year performance, FLDR leads with 3.71% vs 2.46% for IGSB. On fees, IGSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLDR has performed better with a 3.71% return vs 2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.

IGSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 4.42% for FLDR.

IGSB tracks ICE BofAML 1-5 Year US Corporate Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IGSB and 0.15% for FLDR.

FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.99 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGSB and FLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer