IMAR vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IMAR (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMAR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IMAR returned 8.80% vs 299.04% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. IMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

IMAR vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMAR achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -27.52% return.

IMAR

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 1.27%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 1Y: 8.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 38.88%
• 6M: -2.59%
• YTD: -27.52%
• 1Y: 299.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMAR vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IMAR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March	2.15%	18.88%	-5.35%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-27.52%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IMAR and MSTZ is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.30

Return for Risk

IMAR vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMAR

IMAR Risk / Return Rank: 36
IMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
IMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
IMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 41
IMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
IMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMAR vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMAR	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	2.03	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	2.49	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	3.55	-2.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.91	6.84	-1.93

IMAR vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMAR and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMAR vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.05%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAR and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMAR	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.05%	-99.38%	+90.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.91%	-84.89%	+77.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-97.53%	+96.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.83%	-94.55%	+92.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	43.95%	-42.15%

Volatility

IMAR vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) is 2.29%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 55.03%. This indicates that IMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMAR	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.29%	55.03%	-52.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.53%	134.45%	-126.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.41%	148.58%	-140.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.35%	170.73%	-161.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.35%	170.73%	-161.38%

IMAR vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMAR vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMAR nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMAR and MSTZ in my portfolio?

IMAR and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMAR or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (55.03%) compared to IMAR (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMAR dropped -9.05% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, IMAR or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 299.04% vs 8.80% for IMAR. On fees, IMAR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IMAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMAR or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 299.04% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMAR or MSTZ?

IMAR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMAR or MSTZ?

IMAR and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IMAR and MSTZ?

IMAR is categorized as Options Trading, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IMAR and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.