PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IMAE.AS is traded in EUR, while INRA.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INRA.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMAE.AS achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than INRA.AS's 42.94% return.


IMAE.AS

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.95%
YTD
6.95%
6M
9.74%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
9.14%

INRA.AS

1D
-0.72%
1M
13.58%
YTD
42.94%
6M
42.17%
1Y
81.85%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IMAE.AS
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
6.95%19.74%8.89%15.99%-1.65%
INRA.AS
iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
42.94%28.27%-20.65%-23.04%3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IMAE.AS and INRA.AS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2022

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMAE.AS
IMAE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IMAE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

INRA.AS
INRA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INRA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INRA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
INRA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
INRA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
INRA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMAE.ASINRA.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.50

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

6.76

-5.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

21.03

-14.83

IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMAE.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the INRA.AS Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMAE.AS and INRA.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMAE.ASINRA.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

3.24

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.14

+0.39

Drawdowns

IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAE.AS drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, smaller than the maximum INRA.AS drawdown of -57.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAE.AS and INRA.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMAE.ASINRA.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.60%

-57.59%

+21.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-11.92%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-44.12%

+27.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-10.26%

+8.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-33.34%

+28.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.85%

-1.29%

Volatility

IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) is 4.85%, while iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that IMAE.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INRA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMAE.ASINRA.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

9.46%

-4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

18.78%

-8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

24.91%

-12.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

25.17%

-11.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

25.17%

-9.63%

IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMAE.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INRA.AS's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMAE.AS nor INRA.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IMAE.AS and INRA.AS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IMAE.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMAE.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INRA.AS.

IMAE.AS is categorized as Europe Equities, while INRA.AS is Alternative Energy Equities. IMAE.AS tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while INRA.AS tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Transition. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IMAE.AS and 0.65% for INRA.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMAE.AS and INRA.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer