IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS
IMAE.AS (iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and INRA.AS (iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - IMAE.AS is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while INRA.AS is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IMAE.AS returned 13.28%/yr vs 6.00%/yr for INRA.AS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMAE.AS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INRA.AS.
Performance
IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IMAE.AS is traded in EUR, while INRA.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INRA.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMAE.AS achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than INRA.AS's 42.94% return.
IMAE.AS
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 16.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
INRA.AS
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 42.94%
- 6M
- 42.17%
- 1Y
- 81.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMAE.AS iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 6.95% | 19.74% | 8.89% | 15.99% | -1.65% |
INRA.AS iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 42.94% | 28.27% | -20.65% | -23.04% | 3.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMAE.AS and INRA.AS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2022 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS — Risk / Return Rank
IMAE.AS
INRA.AS
IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMAE.AS | INRA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.50 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 6.76 | -5.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.19 | 21.03 | -14.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMAE.AS | INRA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 3.24 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.14 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMAE.AS drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, smaller than the maximum INRA.AS drawdown of -57.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAE.AS and INRA.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMAE.AS | INRA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.60% | -57.59% | +21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.47% | -11.92% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -44.12% | +27.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -10.26% | +8.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -33.34% | +28.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 3.85% | -1.29% |
Volatility
IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) is 4.85%, while iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that IMAE.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INRA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMAE.AS | INRA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 9.46% | -4.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.61% | 18.78% | -8.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 24.91% | -12.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 25.17% | -11.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 25.17% | -9.63% |
IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMAE.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INRA.AS's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMAE.AS vs. INRA.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither IMAE.AS nor INRA.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMAE.AS and INRA.AS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IMAE.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IMAE.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INRA.AS.
IMAE.AS is categorized as Europe Equities, while INRA.AS is Alternative Energy Equities. IMAE.AS tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while INRA.AS tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Transition. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IMAE.AS and 0.65% for INRA.AS.
Find the right allocation for IMAE.AS and INRA.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer