IMAE.AS vs. IWDA.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS).
IMAE.AS and IWDA.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMAE.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. IWDA.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both IMAE.AS and IWDA.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMAE.AS or IWDA.AS.
Performance
IMAE.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMAE.AS achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly lower than IWDA.AS's 25.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IMAE.AS has underperformed IWDA.AS with an annualized return of 6.51%, while IWDA.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.
IMAE.AS
7.85%
-4.17%
-3.29%
13.21%
7.15%
6.51%
IWDA.AS
25.08%
2.28%
10.68%
30.84%
12.97%
11.51%
Key characteristics
| IMAE.AS | IWDA.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.24 | 2.72 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.73 | 3.62 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.22 | 1.56 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.78 | 3.63 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.92 | 17.48 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.85% | 1.69% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.24% | 10.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.60% | -33.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.65% | -1.05% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMAE.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IMAE.AS and IWDA.AS have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between IMAE.AS and IWDA.AS is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMAE.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMAE.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither IMAE.AS nor IWDA.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IMAE.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMAE.AS drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, which is greater than IWDA.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAE.AS and IWDA.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMAE.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) at 3.38%. This indicates that IMAE.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.