IMAE.AS vs. VEUR.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.AS).
IMAE.AS and VEUR.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMAE.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. VEUR.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on May 21, 2013. Both IMAE.AS and VEUR.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMAE.AS or VEUR.AS.
Performance
IMAE.AS vs. VEUR.AS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMAE.AS achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than VEUR.AS's 8.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMAE.AS having a 6.69% annualized return and VEUR.AS not far ahead at 6.84%.
IMAE.AS
7.82%
-3.24%
-2.92%
14.20%
7.00%
6.69%
VEUR.AS
8.62%
-2.85%
-2.61%
15.01%
7.10%
6.84%
Key characteristics
| IMAE.AS | VEUR.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.27 | 1.34 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.75 | 1.85 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.82 | 1.96 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.14 | 7.79 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.83% | 1.77% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.27% | 10.28% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.60% | -35.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.68% | -4.36% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMAE.AS vs. VEUR.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMAE.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VEUR.AS's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between IMAE.AS and VEUR.AS is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMAE.AS vs. VEUR.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMAE.AS vs. VEUR.AS - Dividend Comparison
IMAE.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEUR.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMAE.AS iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEUR.AS Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF | 3.02% | 3.00% | 3.32% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 3.24% | 3.62% | 3.05% | 3.19% | 3.13% | 3.79% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
IMAE.AS vs. VEUR.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMAE.AS drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, roughly equal to the maximum VEUR.AS drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAE.AS and VEUR.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMAE.AS vs. VEUR.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.AS) have volatilities of 4.56% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.