INRA.AS vs. NCLR.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS) and WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L).
INRA.AS and NCLR.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INRA.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition. It was launched on Feb 23, 2022. NCLR.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2025. Both INRA.AS and NCLR.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
INRA.AS vs. NCLR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INRA.AS vs. NCLR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INRA.AS iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 11.84% | 44.98% |
NCLR.L WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF | 19.73% | 121.93% |
Different Trading Currencies
INRA.AS is traded in USD, while NCLR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the NCLR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INRA.AS achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly lower than NCLR.L's 19.73% return.
INRA.AS
- 1D
- 3.54%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 11.84%
- 6M
- 17.65%
- 1Y
- 63.12%
- 3Y*
- -1.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NCLR.L
- 1D
- 7.88%
- 1M
- -10.55%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 167.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INRA.AS vs. NCLR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRA.AS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NCLR.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
INRA.AS vs. NCLR.L — Risk / Return Rank
INRA.AS
NCLR.L
INRA.AS vs. NCLR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS) and WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INRA.AS | NCLR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.54 | 3.36 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.26 | 3.60 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.46 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 5.60 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.63 | 15.22 | +3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INRA.AS | NCLR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 3.36 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 3.06 | -3.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between INRA.AS and NCLR.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
INRA.AS vs. NCLR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither INRA.AS nor NCLR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
INRA.AS vs. NCLR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INRA.AS drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, which is greater than NCLR.L's maximum drawdown of -29.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRA.AS and NCLR.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INRA.AS | NCLR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.31% | -28.14% | -26.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -28.14% | +16.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.85% | -13.78% | -5.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -7.47% | -22.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 10.11% | -6.49% |
Volatility
INRA.AS vs. NCLR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS) is 8.16%, while WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L) has a volatility of 16.10%. This indicates that INRA.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCLR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INRA.AS | NCLR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 16.10% | -7.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.73% | 38.08% | -19.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.53% | 49.58% | -25.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 49.06% | -22.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 49.06% | -22.47% |