ILTB vs. PIT
ILTB (iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILTB is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 10+ Year Index (USD), while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. ILTB is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ILTB returned 2.68%/yr vs 18.98%/yr for PIT. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. ILTB charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.
Performance
ILTB vs. PIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILTB achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 25.62% return.
ILTB
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- -3.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
PIT
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -11.78%
- YTD
- 25.62%
- 6M
- 23.58%
- 1Y
- 39.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILTB vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILTB iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | 1.02% | 7.22% | -3.00% | 8.04% | -3.17% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 25.62% | 21.63% | 6.77% | -4.54% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILTB and PIT is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022 | -0.10 |
The correlation between ILTB and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILTB vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank
ILTB
PIT
ILTB vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILTB | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.33 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 2.62 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | 10.88 | -8.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILTB vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILTB drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILTB and PIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILTB | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.88% | -15.19% | -21.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | -15.19% | +9.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.60% | -15.19% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.72% | -15.19% | -5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.95% | -4.08% | -5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 3.66% | -1.47% |
Volatility
ILTB vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) is 1.89%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that ILTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILTB | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 4.72% | -2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.68% | 19.40% | -13.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.72% | 21.66% | -13.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 17.50% | -4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.56% | 17.50% | -5.94% |
ILTB vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILTB vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison
ILTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than PIT's 7.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILTB iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | 4.92% | 4.83% | 4.91% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 3.45% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 3.99% | 4.20% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 7.10% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILTB and PIT have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIT has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to ILTB (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILTB dropped -36.88% vs PIT's -15.19%.
On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 18.98% vs 2.68% for ILTB. On fees, ILTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ILTB has been the lower-risk option at 1.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 18.98% return vs 2.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 4.92% for ILTB.
ILTB is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ILTB and 0.55% for PIT.
PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILTB and PIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer