ILOW vs. VEA

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

ILOW (AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ILOW is actively managed, while VEA is passively managed. Over the past year, ILOW returned 12.17% vs 27.57% for VEA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILOW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.

Performance

ILOW vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILOW achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.80% return.

ILOW

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: 5.60%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 1Y: 12.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VEA

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -0.81%
• 6M: 10.12%
• YTD: 13.80%
• 1Y: 27.57%
• 3Y*: 17.99%
• 5Y*: 9.88%
• 10Y*: 10.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILOW vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ILOW AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF	7.07%	26.99%	-1.53%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	13.80%	35.16%	-5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ILOW and VEA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2024	0.90

The correlation between ILOW and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILOW vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ILOW	VEA
Financial Services	27.1%	23.1%
Industrials	13.9%	17.8%
Technology	10.4%	17.2%
Healthcare	9.1%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	9.0%	5.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	7.1%
Communication Services	5.0%	3.1%
Energy	2.8%	4.9%
Real Estate	2.4%	2.3%
Utilities	1.6%	3.2%
Basic Materials	1.6%	7.7%

Return for Risk

ILOW vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILOW

ILOW Risk / Return Rank: 31
ILOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
ILOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
ILOW Omega Ratio Rank: 29
ILOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
ILOW Martin Ratio Rank: 38

VEA

VEA Risk / Return Rank: 61
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILOW vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ILOW	VEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.63	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	2.25	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.30	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	2.38	-1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.84	9.03	-4.19

ILOW vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILOW and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ILOW vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILOW drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILOW and VEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILOW	VEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.37%	-60.68%	+50.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.80%	-11.63%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.26%	-2.47%	+1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-13.23%	+11.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	3.06%	-0.54%

Volatility

ILOW vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) is 2.95%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that ILOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILOW	VEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.95%	5.33%	-2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.62%	15.09%	-3.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.70%	17.02%	-3.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.47%	16.80%	-2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.47%	17.17%	-2.70%

ILOW vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILOW vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

ILOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than VEA's 2.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILOW AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF	1.50%	1.60%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	2.57%	3.22%	3.35%	3.15%	2.91%	3.16%	2.04%	3.04%	3.35%	2.77%	3.05%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILOW and VEA in my portfolio?

ILOW and VEA have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ILOW or VEA?

VEA has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to ILOW (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILOW dropped -10.37% vs VEA's -60.68%.

Which ETF is better, ILOW or VEA?

On 1-year performance, VEA leads with 27.57% vs 12.17% for ILOW. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ILOW or VEA?

Over the 1-year period, VEA has performed better with a 27.57% return vs 12.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ILOW or VEA?

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ILOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ILOW or VEA?

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 1.50% for ILOW.

What is the main difference between ILOW and VEA?

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ILOW and 0.03% for VEA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.