ILIT vs. XLE
ILIT (Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - ILIT tracks the STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net while XLE tracks the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ILIT returned 181.76% vs 45.00% for XLE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ILIT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
ILIT vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILIT achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return.
ILIT
- 1D
- -3.77%
- 1M
- -12.04%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 35.19%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 32.17%
- 6M
- 29.80%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 20.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
ILIT vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF | 25.82% | 81.51% | -45.14% | -28.86% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.17% | 7.88% | 5.56% | 10.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILIT and XLE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.18 |
The correlation between ILIT and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ILIT vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILIT
XLE
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
ILIT
XLE
-
Industrials
ILIT
XLE
-
Technology
ILIT
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
ILIT
XLE
-
Communication Services
ILIT
-
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
ILIT
-
XLE
-
Energy
ILIT
-
XLE
Financial Services
ILIT
-
XLE
-
Healthcare
ILIT
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
ILIT
-
XLE
-
Utilities
ILIT
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILIT vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
ILIT
XLE
ILIT vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILIT | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.74 | 2.21 | +1.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.84 | 2.84 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.35 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.00 | 3.75 | +4.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.21 | 10.92 | +11.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILIT | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.74 | 2.21 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.31 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
ILIT vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILIT drawdown since its inception was -73.69%, roughly equal to the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILIT and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILIT | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.69% | -71.26% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.86% | -12.05% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.69% | -6.15% | -11.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.87% | -17.98% | -27.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.22% | 4.14% | +4.08% |
Volatility
ILIT vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 8.25%. This indicates that ILIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILIT | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.95% | 8.25% | +3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.28% | 16.58% | +16.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.97% | 20.53% | +28.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.58% | 26.02% | +15.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.58% | 29.59% | +11.99% |
ILIT vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILIT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILIT vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
ILIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than XLE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF | 1.81% | 2.27% | 6.48% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.54% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILIT and XLE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILIT has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to XLE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILIT dropped -73.69% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 1-year performance, ILIT leads with 181.76% vs 45.00% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILIT has performed better with a 181.76% return vs 45.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ILIT.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.81% for ILIT.
ILIT tracks STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ILIT and 0.08% for XLE.
ILIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILIT and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer