PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILF vs. SOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILF vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILF achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 104.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ILF has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 8.33%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.79% annualized return.


ILF

1D
-2.72%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
11.66%
6M
10.51%
1Y
39.82%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
8.33%

SOXX

1D
1.76%
1M
33.25%
YTD
104.57%
6M
99.43%
1Y
190.05%
3Y*
57.39%
5Y*
34.50%
10Y*
35.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILF vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILF
iShares Latin American 40 ETF
11.66%52.65%-23.11%33.14%9.81%-13.59%-11.71%13.77%-6.85%26.33%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
104.57%40.74%12.92%67.12%-35.09%44.09%52.72%62.42%-6.49%39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ILF and SOXX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2001

0.49

ILF vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILF
SOXX

Financial Services

34.1%

-

Basic Materials

21.9%

-

Energy

13.4%

-

Industrials

9.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.8%

-

Utilities

4.9%

-

Communication Services

4.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%

-

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Financial Services

ILF
34.1%
SOXX

-

Basic Materials

ILF
21.9%
SOXX

-

Energy

ILF
13.4%
SOXX

-

Industrials

ILF
9.2%
SOXX

-

Consumer Defensive

ILF
8.8%
SOXX

-

Utilities

ILF
4.9%
SOXX

-

Communication Services

ILF
4.5%
SOXX

-

Consumer Cyclical

ILF
1.2%
SOXX

-

Healthcare

ILF
1.2%
SOXX

-

Real Estate

ILF
0.7%
SOXX

-

Technology

ILF

-

SOXX
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILF vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILF
ILF Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILF Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILF vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILFSOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.74

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

12.13

-8.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

46.43

-36.73

ILF vs. SOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILF Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the SOXX Sharpe Ratio of 5.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILF and SOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILFSOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

5.61

-3.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.96

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

1.07

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.45

-0.15

Drawdowns

ILF vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILF drawdown since its inception was -67.48%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILF and SOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILFSOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.48%

-70.21%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-15.77%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.97%

-41.36%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-45.75%

+16.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.79%

-45.75%

-12.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.76%

0.00%

-10.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.94%

-19.97%

-3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

4.11%

+0.01%

Volatility

ILF vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) is 6.49%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that ILF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILFSOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

14.03%

-7.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

27.35%

-8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.76%

34.18%

-12.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.18%

36.11%

-12.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.44%

33.43%

-4.99%

ILF vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

ILF vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison

ILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILF
iShares Latin American 40 ETF
3.93%4.39%7.44%4.61%12.72%8.47%1.88%3.09%3.12%1.80%1.59%3.25%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.27%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILF and SOXX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXX has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to ILF (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILF dropped -67.48% vs SOXX's -70.21%.

On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.79% vs 8.33% for ILF. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ILF has been the lower-risk option at 6.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.79% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for ILF.

ILF has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.

ILF is categorized as Latin America Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. ILF tracks S&P Latin America 40 Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for ILF and 0.34% for SOXX.

SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILF and SOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer