ILF vs. BITI
ILF (iShares Latin American 40 ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILF is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the S&P Latin America 40 (Net), while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ILF returned 13.39%/yr vs -30.65%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. ILF charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
ILF vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILF achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.
ILF
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 1Y
- 38.91%
- 3Y*
- 13.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
BITI
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 34.68%
- YTD
- 28.75%
- 1Y
- 68.34%
- 3Y*
- -30.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILF vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 13.45% | 52.65% | -23.11% | 33.14% | 6.98% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 28.75% | -1.76% | -62.60% | -66.17% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILF and BITI is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022 | -0.27 |
The correlation between ILF and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to -0.27 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILF vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
ILF
BITI
ILF vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILF | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 2.72 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 6.78 | +0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILF vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILF drawdown since its inception was -67.48%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILF and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILF | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.48% | -92.16% | +24.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.94% | -25.28% | +11.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.97% | -84.63% | +60.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.33% | -85.94% | +76.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.88% | -68.34% | +44.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 10.11% | -5.01% |
Volatility
ILF vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) is 5.84%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that ILF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILF | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 11.38% | -5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.41% | 34.25% | -15.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.22% | 44.14% | -21.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 52.28% | -29.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.25% | 52.28% | -24.03% |
ILF vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILF vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
ILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 15.10% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 3.46% | 4.39% | 7.44% | 4.61% | 12.72% | 8.47% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.12% | 1.80% | 1.59% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILF and BITI have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to ILF (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILF dropped -67.48% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 3-year performance, ILF leads with 13.39% vs -30.65% for BITI. On fees, ILF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ILF has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ILF has performed better with a 13.39% return vs -30.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 3.46% for ILF.
ILF is categorized as Latin America Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. ILF tracks S&P Latin America 40 (Net), while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ILF and 1.03% for BITI.
ILF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILF and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer