PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILDR vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ILDR vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ILDR vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
-9.73%29.22%29.31%39.34%-34.95%7.29%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
5.17%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%10.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILDR achieves a -9.73% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 5.17% return.


ILDR

1D
4.70%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-9.73%
6M
-8.06%
1Y
27.69%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10Y*

QCLN

1D
0.90%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
5.17%
6M
8.63%
1Y
61.08%
3Y*
-2.97%
5Y*
-7.09%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ILDR vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ILDR vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILDR
ILDR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ILDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILDR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ILDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILDR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILDR vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILDRQCLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

1.63

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

2.23

-0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

3.97

-2.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.02

12.27

-7.25

ILDR vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILDR Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILDR and QCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILDRQCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.63

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.15

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between ILDR and QCLN is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ILDR vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

ILDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.21%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Drawdowns

ILDR vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and QCLN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ILDRQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.61%

-76.18%

+31.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-16.18%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.83%

-45.67%

+31.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-43.54%

+28.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

5.24%

+0.04%

Volatility

ILDR vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) is 8.51%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that ILDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ILDRQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.51%

13.73%

-5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

27.33%

-10.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.60%

37.76%

-11.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.13%

37.87%

-11.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.13%

34.62%

-8.49%