ILDR vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ILDR (First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ILDR is actively managed, while KROP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ILDR returned 28.32%/yr vs -1.05%/yr for KROP. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ILDR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

ILDR vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILDR achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 11.60% return.

ILDR

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 14.03%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 34.64%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 11.60%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 7.63%
• 3Y*: -1.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILDR vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF	14.03%	29.22%	29.31%	39.34%	-34.95%	-1.00%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	11.60%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ILDR and KROP is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between ILDR and KROP has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ILDR vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ILDR	KROP
Technology	49.8%	-
Healthcare	13.4%	0.3%
Industrials	12.4%	40.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	0.3%
Communication Services	9.1%	-
Financial Services	2.9%	-
Energy	1.6%	-
Utilities	1.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	32.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	27.1%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

ILDR vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILDR

ILDR Risk / Return Rank: 43
ILDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ILDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ILDR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ILDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
ILDR Martin Ratio Rank: 42

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 16
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILDR vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ILDR	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	0.47	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	0.79	+1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.10	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	0.68	+1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.37	1.46	+4.91

ILDR vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILDR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILDR and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ILDR vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILDR	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.61%	-62.08%	+17.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-11.29%	-6.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.43%	-28.70%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.20%	-51.27%	+44.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-44.71%	+29.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.46%	5.23%	+0.23%

Volatility

ILDR vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.54%. This indicates that ILDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILDR	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.87%	4.54%	+6.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.42%	12.48%	+5.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.16%	16.19%	+6.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.41%	22.23%	+4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.24%	22.23%	+4.01%

ILDR vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILDR vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

ILDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.16%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.45%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILDR and KROP in my portfolio?

ILDR and KROP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ILDR or KROP?

ILDR has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to KROP (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILDR dropped -44.61% vs KROP's -62.08%.

Which ETF is better, ILDR or KROP?

On 3-year performance, ILDR leads with 28.32% vs -1.05% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ILDR or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, ILDR has performed better with a 28.32% return vs -1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ILDR or KROP?

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ILDR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ILDR or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.00% for ILDR.

What is the main difference between ILDR and KROP?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ILDR and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.