ILCV vs. VFMV

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. ILCV is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ILCV returned 11.47%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for VFMV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILCV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.

Performance

ILCV vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ILCV having a 7.35% return and VFMV slightly higher at 7.46%.

ILCV

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 7.35%
• 6M: 7.96%
• 1Y: 25.66%
• 3Y*: 18.09%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

VFMV

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 6M: 7.72%
• 1Y: 11.60%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: 9.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILCV vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	7.35%	18.79%	17.03%	14.43%	-7.02%	26.71%	-0.84%	25.19%	-6.31%
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF	7.46%	10.52%	16.91%	8.86%	-5.73%	20.75%	-0.19%	27.26%	-1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCV and VFMV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018	0.82

The correlation between ILCV and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILCV vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ILCV	VFMV
Technology	23.8%	25.1%
Financial Services	16.5%	10.6%
Healthcare	11.5%	10.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	6.9%
Industrials	8.8%	10.1%
Communication Services	8.0%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	9.5%
Energy	6.0%	3.9%
Utilities	3.5%	6.7%
Basic Materials	2.4%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	6.4%

Return for Risk

ILCV vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCV

ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 86
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

VFMV

VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 43
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 39
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCV vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ILCV	VFMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	1.32	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	1.93	+1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.23	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.93	1.94	+1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.24	7.57	+8.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ILCV vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCV and VFMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ILCV	VFMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	1.32	+1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.81	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.68	-0.23

Drawdowns

ILCV vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and VFMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILCV	VFMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.63%	-33.64%	-24.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.55%	-6.00%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.95%	-10.35%	-4.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.58%	-15.41%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-2.00%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.32%	-3.63%	-5.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.53%	+0.05%

Volatility

ILCV vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) has a higher volatility of 2.33% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.21%. This indicates that ILCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILCV	VFMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.33%	2.21%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.12%	6.37%	+0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.90%	8.83%	+1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.23%	11.75%	+2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.67%	14.25%	+2.42%

ILCV vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ILCV vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than VFMV's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	1.63%	1.77%	1.99%	2.27%	2.32%	2.01%	2.96%	2.70%	2.93%	2.32%	2.76%	3.01%
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF	1.95%	2.12%	1.46%	2.20%	2.08%	1.31%	2.14%	2.43%	2.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILCV and VFMV in my portfolio?

ILCV and VFMV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ILCV or VFMV?

ILCV has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to VFMV (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs VFMV's -33.64%.

Which ETF is better, ILCV or VFMV?

On 5-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.47% vs 9.52% for VFMV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ILCV or VFMV?

Over the 5-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.47% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ILCV or VFMV?

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ILCV or VFMV?

VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.63% for ILCV.

What is the main difference between ILCV and VFMV?

ILCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.13% for VFMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.