ILCV vs. KWIN
ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - ILCV tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index while KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ILCV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.
Performance
ILCV vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 1.59% return.
ILCV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 1Y
- 25.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCV vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 10.92% | 3.95% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.59% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCV and KWIN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCV vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank
ILCV
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILCV vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCV | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCV vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and KWIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCV | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -1.50% | -57.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -1.44% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -0.25% | -9.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | — | — |
Volatility
ILCV vs. KWIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCV | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.00% | 4.16% | +5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 4.16% | +10.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 4.16% | +12.46% |
ILCV vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILCV vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison
ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.58% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCV and KWIN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.51% for KWIN.
Find the right allocation for ILCV and KWIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer