PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILCV vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILCV vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCV has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.69%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.


ILCV

1D
0.97%
1M
2.91%
YTD
8.79%
6M
8.78%
1Y
28.28%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
11.69%

DGRO

1D
0.81%
1M
3.27%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.87%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILCV vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
8.79%18.79%17.03%14.43%-7.02%26.71%-0.84%25.19%-6.24%15.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.64%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCV and DGRO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.94

The correlation between ILCV and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILCV vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILCV
DGRO

Technology

23.8%
19.4%

Financial Services

16.5%
21.2%

Healthcare

11.5%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
5.7%

Industrials

8.8%
10.8%

Communication Services

8.0%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
11.5%

Energy

6.0%
5.6%

Utilities

3.5%
6.9%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

ILCV
23.8%
DGRO
19.4%

Financial Services

ILCV
16.5%
DGRO
21.2%

Healthcare

ILCV
11.5%
DGRO
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ILCV
9.5%
DGRO
5.7%

Industrials

ILCV
8.8%
DGRO
10.8%

Communication Services

ILCV
8.0%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

ILCV
7.6%
DGRO
11.5%

Energy

ILCV
6.0%
DGRO
5.6%

Utilities

ILCV
3.5%
DGRO
6.9%

Basic Materials

ILCV
2.4%
DGRO
2.5%

Real Estate

ILCV
2.0%
DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILCV vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCV vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILCVDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.46

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

3.71

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.95

14.33

+3.62

ILCV vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCV and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILCVDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.53

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.78

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.81

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.77

-0.31

Drawdowns

ILCV vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILCVDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-35.10%

-23.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-6.47%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-14.03%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

-19.31%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.53%

-35.10%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-3.44%

-5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.67%

-0.09%

Volatility

ILCV vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is 2.06%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that ILCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILCVDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

2.24%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.03%

6.94%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

9.49%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

13.82%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

16.62%

+0.04%

ILCV vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ILCV vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than DGRO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.61%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ILCV and DGRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DGRO has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to ILCV (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.34% vs 11.69% for ILCV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.61% for ILCV.

ILCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.08% for DGRO.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILCV and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer