ILCV vs. DGRO
ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCV returned 11.90%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for DGRO. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ILCV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
ILCV vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCV has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.90%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.
ILCV
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.73%
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $103.52M | $104.25M | $110.17M | |
| $1.89M | $2.26M | $2.59M |
ILCV vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 12.42% | 18.79% | 17.03% | 14.43% | -7.02% | 26.71% | -0.84% | 25.19% | -6.24% | 15.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 13.39% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCV and DGRO is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.94 |
The correlation between ILCV and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILCV vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCV
DGRO
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
ILCV
DGRO
Financial Services
ILCV
DGRO
Healthcare
ILCV
DGRO
Communication Services
ILCV
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
ILCV
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
ILCV
DGRO
Industrials
ILCV
DGRO
Energy
ILCV
DGRO
Utilities
ILCV
DGRO
Basic Materials
ILCV
DGRO
Real Estate
ILCV
DGRO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCV vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
ILCV
DGRO
ILCV vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCV | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.45 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 3.61 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.65 | 14.07 | +3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCV vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCV | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -35.10% | -23.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -6.47% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -14.03% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | -19.31% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.53% | -35.10% | -0.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.35% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -3.41% | -5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.66% | -0.10% |
Volatility
ILCV vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is 2.91%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that ILCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCV | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 3.21% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 7.12% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.09% | 9.61% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 13.79% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 16.58% | +0.05% |
ILCV vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCV vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than DGRO's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.89% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.55% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCV and DGRO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRO has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to ILCV (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.44% vs 11.90% for ILCV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.55% for ILCV.
ILCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.08% for DGRO.
ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCV and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer