ILCG vs. DFIV

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. ILCG is passively managed, while DFIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ILCG returned 24.07%/yr vs 23.38%/yr for DFIV. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ILCG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.

Performance

ILCG vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCG achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 12.20% return.

ILCG

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 9.97%
• 6M: 11.01%
• 1Y: 24.20%
• 3Y*: 24.07%
• 5Y*: 13.61%
• 10Y*: 17.85%

DFIV

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 12.20%
• 6M: 13.92%
• 1Y: 34.38%
• 3Y*: 23.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILCG vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	9.97%	16.71%	32.82%	40.41%	-31.75%	4.55%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	12.20%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCG and DFIV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021	0.57

The correlation between ILCG and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILCG vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ILCG	DFIV
Technology	53.1%	3.2%
Communication Services	13.5%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.0%
Industrials	7.7%	9.8%
Financial Services	5.5%	32.4%
Healthcare	5.2%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	4.9%
Real Estate	1.3%	1.7%
Basic Materials	1.0%	11.4%
Utilities	0.7%	2.2%
Energy	0.4%	15.3%

Return for Risk

ILCG vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCG

ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 39
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 82
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCG vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ILCG	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.39	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	3.26	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.43	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	3.48	-2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.04	13.34	-8.30

ILCG vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCG and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ILCG vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and DFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILCG	DFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.98%	-25.42%	-27.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.65%	-9.66%	-5.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.10%	-14.72%	-8.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.92%	-0.43%	-4.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.21%	-4.46%	-3.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	2.52%	+1.99%

Volatility

ILCG vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 4.50%. This indicates that ILCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILCG	DFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.77%	4.50%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.98%	11.46%	+2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.16%	14.10%	+3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.12%	16.66%	+5.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.59%	16.66%	+4.93%

ILCG vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ILCG vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than DFIV's 2.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.54%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	0.42%	0.47%	0.50%	0.69%	0.75%	0.34%	0.28%	0.54%	0.81%	0.89%	0.95%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILCG and DFIV in my portfolio?

ILCG and DFIV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ILCG or DFIV?

ILCG has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to DFIV (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCG dropped -52.98% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, ILCG or DFIV?

On 3-year performance, ILCG leads with 24.07% vs 23.38% for DFIV. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ILCG or DFIV?

Over the 3-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 24.07% return vs 23.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ILCG or DFIV?

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ILCG or DFIV?

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.

What is the main difference between ILCG and DFIV?

ILCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCG and 0.27% for DFIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.