ILCG vs. BBUS
ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while BBUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ILCG returned 12.71%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILCG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
ILCG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCG achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 7.57% return.
ILCG
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 22.02%
- 3Y*
- 23.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- 18.10%
BBUS
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 6.62%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- —
ILCG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 9.21% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 40.41% | -31.75% | 24.33% | 38.56% | 18.23% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 7.57% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCG and BBUS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between ILCG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILCG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCG
BBUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
ILCG
BBUS
Communication Services
ILCG
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
ILCG
BBUS
Industrials
ILCG
BBUS
Financial Services
ILCG
BBUS
Healthcare
ILCG
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
ILCG
BBUS
Real Estate
ILCG
BBUS
Basic Materials
ILCG
BBUS
Utilities
ILCG
BBUS
Energy
ILCG
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
ILCG
BBUS
ILCG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 2.49 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | 10.97 | -6.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.98% | -35.35% | -17.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.65% | -9.21% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.10% | -19.01% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.38% | -25.46% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.58% | -3.47% | -2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -5.43% | -2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 2.08% | +2.46% |
Volatility
ILCG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 5.00%. This indicates that ILCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 5.00% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 9.95% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 12.59% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 17.14% | +5.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 19.59% | +2.04% |
ILCG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than BBUS's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ILCG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ILCG has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to BBUS (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCG dropped -52.98% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, ILCG leads with 12.71% vs 12.52% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for ILCG.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.
ILCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCG and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCG and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer