PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILCG vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILCG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCG achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 7.57% return.


ILCG

1D
-2.86%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
9.21%
6M
7.82%
1Y
22.02%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
18.10%

BBUS

1D
-1.68%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.62%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILCG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
9.21%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%24.33%38.56%18.23%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
7.57%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCG and BBUS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.94

The correlation between ILCG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILCG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILCG
BBUS

Technology

53.1%
38.1%

Communication Services

13.5%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.1%

Industrials

7.7%
7.4%

Financial Services

5.5%
11.2%

Healthcare

5.2%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
4.4%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.2%

Utilities

0.7%
2.6%

Energy

0.4%
3.0%

Technology

ILCG
53.1%
BBUS
38.1%

Communication Services

ILCG
13.5%
BBUS
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ILCG
10.1%
BBUS
9.1%

Industrials

ILCG
7.7%
BBUS
7.4%

Financial Services

ILCG
5.5%
BBUS
11.2%

Healthcare

ILCG
5.2%
BBUS
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

ILCG
1.4%
BBUS
4.4%

Real Estate

ILCG
1.3%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

ILCG
1.0%
BBUS
1.2%

Utilities

ILCG
0.7%
BBUS
2.6%

Energy

ILCG
0.4%
BBUS
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILCG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ILCGBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.49

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

10.97

-6.11

ILCG vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCG and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILCG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILCGBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.98%

-35.35%

-17.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-9.21%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

-19.01%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.38%

-25.46%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.58%

-3.47%

-2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-5.43%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

2.08%

+2.46%

Volatility

ILCG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 5.00%. This indicates that ILCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILCGBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

5.00%

+2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

9.95%

+4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

12.59%

+5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.22%

17.14%

+5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.63%

19.59%

+2.04%

ILCG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ILCG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than BBUS's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.42%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ILCG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ILCG has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to BBUS (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCG dropped -52.98% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, ILCG leads with 12.71% vs 12.52% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for ILCG.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.

ILCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCG and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILCG and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer