IJT vs. HYG
IJT (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJT is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJT returned 10.80%/yr vs 4.97%/yr for HYG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.
Performance
IJT vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IJT has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 10.80%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.97% annualized return.
IJT
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
HYG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.97%
IJT vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 16.04% | 5.26% | 9.33% | 17.11% | -21.32% | 22.37% | 19.22% | 20.98% | -4.40% | 14.47% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.60% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJT and HYG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between IJT and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJT vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJT
HYG
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Technology
IJT
HYG
-
Industrials
IJT
HYG
-
Healthcare
IJT
HYG
-
Financial Services
IJT
HYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
IJT
HYG
-
Real Estate
IJT
HYG
Energy
IJT
HYG
-
Basic Materials
IJT
HYG
-
Consumer Defensive
IJT
HYG
-
Communication Services
IJT
HYG
-
Utilities
IJT
HYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJT vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank
IJT
HYG
IJT vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJT | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 1.85 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 2.80 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.36 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.99 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 13.22 | -2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJT | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.85 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.52 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.46 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
IJT vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and HYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJT | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.61% | -34.25% | -23.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -2.34% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.41% | -4.56% | -22.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -15.79% | -13.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.03% | -22.03% | -20.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.00% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -3.24% | -7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 0.53% | +2.08% |
Volatility
IJT vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.22%. This indicates that IJT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJT | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 1.22% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 3.00% | +9.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.55% | 3.79% | +13.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 7.52% | +13.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.03% | 8.29% | +14.74% |
IJT vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJT vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than HYG's 5.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.90% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 0.76% | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.03% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJT and HYG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJT has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to HYG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs HYG's -34.25%.
On 10-year performance, IJT leads with 10.80% vs 4.97% for HYG. On fees, IJT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJT has performed better with a 10.80% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 0.76% for IJT.
IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.49% for HYG.
HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJT and HYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer