PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJS vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJS vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -7.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IJS has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 9.94%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.21% annualized return.


IJS

1D
0.13%
1M
0.19%
6M
13.33%
YTD
19.55%
1Y
32.31%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
9.94%

GLD

1D
-2.62%
1M
-5.02%
6M
-13.05%
YTD
-7.36%
1Y
18.76%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
16.50%
10Y*
11.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJS vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
19.55%6.54%7.33%14.68%-11.34%30.53%2.63%24.11%-12.86%11.35%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-7.36%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and GLD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.06

The correlation between IJS and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJS vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJS vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJSGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.15

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

0.72

+2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.53

1.76

+9.77

IJS vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJS vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJSGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-45.56%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-26.21%

+16.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-26.21%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

-26.21%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

-26.21%

-21.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-25.97%

+24.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-16.19%

+6.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

10.69%

-7.88%

Volatility

IJS vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) is 4.40%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that IJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJSGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

7.58%

-3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

24.18%

-12.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

27.96%

-9.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

18.39%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

16.10%

+7.44%

IJS vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJS vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.33%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJS and GLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to IJS (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 11.21% vs 9.94% for IJS. On fees, IJS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 11.21% return vs 9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

IJS has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

IJS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while GLD is Gold. IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.40% for GLD.

IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJS and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer