PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJS vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJS vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 16.70% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IJS has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 10.07%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.89% annualized return.


IJS

1D
1.37%
1M
2.47%
YTD
16.70%
6M
16.73%
1Y
39.28%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
10.07%

DBO

1D
-2.66%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
79.84%
6M
74.51%
1Y
77.38%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJS vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
16.70%6.54%7.33%14.68%-11.34%30.53%2.63%24.11%-12.86%11.35%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
79.84%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and DBO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007

0.29

The correlation between IJS and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJS vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJS
DBO

Financial Services

19.8%
116.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.9%

-

Industrials

11.6%

-

Technology

11.3%

-

Real Estate

8.7%

-

Energy

7.6%

-

Healthcare

7.6%

-

Basic Materials

7.1%

-

Communication Services

4.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.8%

-

Utilities

2.2%

-

Financial Services

IJS
19.8%
DBO
116.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IJS
15.9%
DBO

-

Industrials

IJS
11.6%
DBO

-

Technology

IJS
11.3%
DBO

-

Real Estate

IJS
8.7%
DBO

-

Energy

IJS
7.6%
DBO

-

Healthcare

IJS
7.6%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

IJS
7.1%
DBO

-

Communication Services

IJS
4.4%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

IJS
3.8%
DBO

-

Utilities

IJS
2.2%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJS vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJS vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJSDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

4.28

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

8.69

+5.22

IJS vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJSDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.25

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.48

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.34

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.02

+0.39

Drawdowns

IJS vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJSDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-90.18%

+30.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-18.19%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-28.20%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

-37.68%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

-61.69%

+14.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-52.68%

+52.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.89%

-62.25%

+52.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

8.94%

-6.11%

Volatility

IJS vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) is 4.47%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that IJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJSDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

12.79%

-8.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

28.32%

-16.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

34.58%

-16.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.99%

32.31%

-10.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

31.79%

-8.19%

IJS vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJS vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than DBO's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.95%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.27%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJS and DBO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to IJS (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 10.89% vs 10.07% for IJS. On fees, IJS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 10.89% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.27% for IJS.

IJS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJS and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer