IJR vs. VTI
IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJR returned 10.83%/yr vs 14.66%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IJR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
IJR vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 23.60% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IJR has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 10.83%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.
IJR
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- YTD
- 23.60%
- 1Y
- 38.11%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.21%
VTI
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 9.81%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $497.97M | $462.30M | $544.01M | |
| $1.08B | $1.16B | $1.24B |
IJR vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 23.60% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 12.18% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJR and VTI is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IJR and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IJR vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJR
VTI
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
IJR
VTI
Industrials
IJR
VTI
Technology
IJR
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
IJR
VTI
Healthcare
IJR
VTI
Real Estate
IJR
VTI
Energy
IJR
VTI
Basic Materials
IJR
VTI
Consumer Defensive
IJR
VTI
Communication Services
IJR
VTI
Utilities
IJR
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJR vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
IJR
VTI
IJR vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJR | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.32 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 2.67 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.06 | 11.50 | +3.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJR vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJR | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.15% | -55.45% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -8.92% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -19.30% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -25.36% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.36% | -35.00% | -9.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | 0.00% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.23% | -7.98% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 2.07% | +0.47% |
Volatility
IJR vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 3.73% and 3.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJR | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 3.78% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 10.33% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.30% | 13.08% | +4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 17.53% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 18.31% | +4.55% |
IJR vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJR vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.11% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJR and VTI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTI has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to IJR (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJR dropped -58.15% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.66% vs 10.83% for IJR. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.66% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IJR.
IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.
IJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IJR and 0.03% for VTI.
IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJR and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer