IJR vs. CSB
IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) and CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index while CSB tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJR returned 10.66%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for CSB. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSB.
Performance
IJR vs. CSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 8.30% return. Over the past 10 years, IJR has outperformed CSB with an annualized return of 10.66%, while CSB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.
IJR
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 6M
- 14.25%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
CSB
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
IJR vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 15.38% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 8.30% | 2.26% | 9.64% | 12.60% | -13.11% | 27.04% | 11.30% | 21.12% | -7.10% | 11.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJR and CSB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IJR and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJR vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJR
CSB
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
IJR
CSB
Industrials
IJR
CSB
Technology
IJR
CSB
Consumer Cyclical
IJR
CSB
Healthcare
IJR
CSB
Real Estate
IJR
CSB
-
Energy
IJR
CSB
Basic Materials
IJR
CSB
Communication Services
IJR
CSB
Consumer Defensive
IJR
CSB
Utilities
IJR
CSB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJR vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank
IJR
CSB
IJR vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJR | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 1.25 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 1.92 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.22 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 2.51 | +1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | 7.26 | +4.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJR | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 1.25 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.20 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.45 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.45 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
IJR vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, which is greater than CSB's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and CSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJR | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.15% | -42.07% | -16.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -7.18% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -21.82% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -24.49% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.36% | -42.07% | -2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -3.12% | +2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -7.14% | -2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.48% | +0.12% |
Volatility
IJR vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.59%. This indicates that IJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJR | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 3.59% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 9.19% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 14.54% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 18.78% | +2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 21.31% | +1.60% |
IJR vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJR vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison
IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.26% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.15% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJR and CSB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJR has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJR dropped -58.15% vs CSB's -42.07%.
On 10-year performance, IJR leads with 10.66% vs 9.58% for CSB. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJR has performed better with a 10.66% return vs 9.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSB.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.15% for IJR.
IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IJR and 0.35% for CSB.
IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJR and CSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer