PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPN.L vs. IGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPN.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IJPN.L is traded in GBp, while IGLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGLN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPN.L achieves a 16.83% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IJPN.L has underperformed IGLN.L with an annualized return of 10.48%, while IGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.


IJPN.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
3.86%
YTD
16.83%
6M
16.00%
1Y
36.20%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.48%

IGLN.L

1D
0.68%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
4.12%
6M
5.31%
1Y
34.58%
3Y*
28.24%
5Y*
19.89%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPN.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJPN.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
16.83%18.18%9.39%14.03%-7.13%2.20%12.46%14.55%-8.45%13.27%
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
4.09%53.17%28.35%7.77%11.79%-3.12%20.51%13.78%4.54%2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPN.L and IGLN.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPN.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPN.L
IJPN.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IJPN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPN.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJPN.LIGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

1.91

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

5.10

+5.42

IJPN.L vs. IGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPN.L and IGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJPN.LIGLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.39

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.18

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.87

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.52

-0.10

Drawdowns

IJPN.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPN.L drawdown since its inception was -39.73%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -41.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPN.L and IGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPN.LIGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.73%

-41.86%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.80%

-17.53%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.09%

-17.53%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.57%

-17.53%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.34%

-22.37%

-1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-15.75%

+15.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-14.94%

+4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

6.59%

-3.27%

Volatility

IJPN.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) is 3.88%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that IJPN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPN.LIGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

5.91%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.00%

21.10%

-6.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

24.06%

-5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

16.80%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

16.34%

-0.36%

IJPN.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJPN.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJPN.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

IJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while IGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJPN.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.03%2.25%1.95%1.81%2.10%1.66%1.75%1.90%1.89%1.53%1.55%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJPN.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IJPN.L.

IJPN.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while IGLN.L is Gold. IJPN.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IJPN.L and 0.25% for IGLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPN.L and IGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer