IJPN.L vs. IWRD.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) and iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS).
IJPN.L and IWRD.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IJPN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Oct 1, 2004. IWRD.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 28, 2005. Both IJPN.L and IWRD.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IJPN.L or IWRD.AS.
Key characteristics
IJPN.L | IWRD.AS | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 8.76% | 26.20% |
1Y Return | 13.07% | 33.98% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 3.43% | 9.63% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 5.25% | 13.02% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 8.08% | 11.75% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.83 | 2.91 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.18 | 3.87 |
Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.60 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.06 | 3.83 |
Martin Ratio | 3.00 | 18.24 |
Ulcer Index | 4.36% | 1.74% |
Daily Std Dev | 15.64% | 10.86% |
Max Drawdown | -39.73% | -51.80% |
Current Drawdown | -4.02% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJPN.L and IWRD.AS is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IJPN.L vs. IWRD.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IJPN.L achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than IWRD.AS's 26.20% return. Over the past 10 years, IJPN.L has underperformed IWRD.AS with an annualized return of 8.08%, while IWRD.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IJPN.L vs. IWRD.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJPN.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IWRD.AS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IJPN.L vs. IWRD.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) and iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IJPN.L vs. IWRD.AS - Dividend Comparison
IJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than IWRD.AS's 1.04% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.96% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.90% | 1.89% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 0.87% | 2.70% | 1.20% |
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF | 1.04% | 1.32% | 1.49% | 1.01% | 1.21% | 1.62% | 1.84% | 1.67% | 1.70% | 1.81% | 1.55% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
IJPN.L vs. IWRD.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJPN.L drawdown since its inception was -39.73%, smaller than the maximum IWRD.AS drawdown of -51.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPN.L and IWRD.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IJPN.L vs. IWRD.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) at 3.03%. This indicates that IJPN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWRD.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.