IJPH.L vs. IGSG.L
IJPH.L (iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) and IGSG.L (iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IJPH.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while IGSG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJPH.L returned 15.77%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for IGSG.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJPH.L charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for IGSG.L.
Performance
IJPH.L vs. IGSG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IJPH.L is traded in GBP, while IGSG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IGSG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJPH.L achieves a 20.84% return, which is significantly higher than IGSG.L's 8.54% return. Over the past 10 years, IJPH.L has outperformed IGSG.L with an annualized return of 15.77%, while IGSG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.33% annualized return.
IJPH.L
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- 20.84%
- 6M
- 20.67%
- 1Y
- 53.19%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- 20.46%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
IGSG.L
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
IJPH.L vs. IGSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 20.84% | 29.37% | 23.82% | 34.19% | -4.30% | 11.94% | 9.27% | 15.94% | -15.89% | 19.45% |
IGSG.L iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.54% | 14.21% | 12.74% | 19.46% | -7.27% | 23.00% | 9.72% | 21.71% | -3.46% | 11.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJPH.L and IGSG.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012 | 0.62 |
The correlation between IJPH.L and IGSG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJPH.L vs. IGSG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Technology
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Financial Services
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Consumer Cyclical
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Communication Services
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Healthcare
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Consumer Defensive
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Basic Materials
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Real Estate
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Utilities
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Energy
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJPH.L vs. IGSG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IJPH.L
IGSG.L
IJPH.L vs. IGSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJPH.L | IGSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.39 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.49 | 2.80 | +2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.28 | 10.74 | +8.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJPH.L vs. IGSG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJPH.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, smaller than the maximum IGSG.L drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPH.L and IGSG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJPH.L | IGSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.55% | -49.54% | +14.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -8.21% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.95% | -20.05% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -20.05% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | -24.74% | -9.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.75% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.46% | -13.20% | +5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.14% | +0.61% |
Volatility
IJPH.L vs. IGSG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L) at 3.30%. This indicates that IJPH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJPH.L | IGSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 3.30% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.88% | 8.68% | +7.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.36% | 10.77% | +9.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 18.88% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 17.22% | +2.00% |
IJPH.L vs. IGSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJPH.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than IGSG.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJPH.L vs. IGSG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IJPH.L nor IGSG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IJPH.L and IGSG.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGSG.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGSG.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.
IJPH.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while IGSG.L is Global Equities. IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while IGSG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IJPH.L and 0.60% for IGSG.L.
Find the right allocation for IJPH.L and IGSG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer