IGSG.L vs. SSAC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L).
IGSG.L and SSAC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGSG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 25, 2011. SSAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011. Both IGSG.L and SSAC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IGSG.L vs. SSAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGSG.L vs. SSAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGSG.L iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -1.14% | 14.21% | 12.74% | 19.46% | -7.27% | 23.00% | 9.72% | 21.71% | -3.46% | 11.82% |
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | -0.51% | 13.95% | 19.63% | 16.14% | -8.56% | 20.35% | 11.80% | 22.09% | -4.79% | 13.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGSG.L achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than SSAC.L's -0.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IGSG.L having a 12.25% annualized return and SSAC.L not far ahead at 12.30%.
IGSG.L
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 15.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
SSAC.L
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 18.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGSG.L vs. SSAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGSG.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IGSG.L vs. SSAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGSG.L
SSAC.L
IGSG.L vs. SSAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGSG.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.31 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.81 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.27 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.62 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.60 | 9.89 | -2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGSG.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.31 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.82 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.85 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.84 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGSG.L and SSAC.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IGSG.L vs. SSAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGSG.L nor SSAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IGSG.L vs. SSAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGSG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, roughly equal to the maximum SSAC.L drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSG.L and SSAC.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGSG.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.74% | -25.43% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.54% | -10.30% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -17.99% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.74% | -25.43% | +0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -4.04% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -3.54% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.86% | +0.28% |
Volatility
IGSG.L vs. SSAC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) have volatilities of 4.66% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGSG.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 4.52% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 8.34% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.33% | 14.03% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 13.02% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 14.38% | -0.23% |