IGSG.L vs. MWOZ.L
IGSG.L (iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and MWOZ.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist) are both Global Equities funds - IGSG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while MWOZ.L tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IGSG.L returned 24.51% vs 27.68% for MWOZ.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGSG.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MWOZ.L.
Performance
IGSG.L vs. MWOZ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGSG.L is traded in GBp, while MWOZ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MWOZ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGSG.L achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than MWOZ.L's 10.17% return.
IGSG.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 24.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
MWOZ.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 27.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGSG.L vs. MWOZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGSG.L iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.09% | 9.23% |
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 10.17% | 8.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGSG.L and MWOZ.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IGSG.L and MWOZ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGSG.L vs. MWOZ.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGSG.L
MWOZ.L
IGSG.L vs. MWOZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGSG.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.51 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 4.16 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.52 | 16.80 | -5.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGSG.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.68 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.04 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
IGSG.L vs. MWOZ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGSG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, which is greater than MWOZ.L's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSG.L and MWOZ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGSG.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.74% | -18.50% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.21% | -6.63% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.15% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -3.16% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.64% | +0.48% |
Volatility
IGSG.L vs. MWOZ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) at 2.54%. This indicates that IGSG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWOZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGSG.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.54% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 7.27% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 10.29% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 13.91% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.14% | 13.91% | +0.23% |
IGSG.L vs. MWOZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGSG.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOZ.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGSG.L vs. MWOZ.L - Dividend Comparison
IGSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IGSG.L iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 1.20% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGSG.L and MWOZ.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IGSG.L.
IGSG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGSG.L and 0.05% for MWOZ.L.
Find the right allocation for IGSG.L and MWOZ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer