PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPH.L vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPH.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IJPH.L is traded in GBP, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPH.L achieves a 22.15% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -3.24% return. Over the past 10 years, IJPH.L has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 15.19%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 12.54% annualized return.


IJPH.L

1D
-1.00%
1M
1.08%
6M
14.52%
YTD
22.15%
1Y
52.01%
3Y*
28.65%
5Y*
21.31%
10Y*
15.19%

BRK-B

1D
-1.59%
1M
-2.31%
6M
-1.58%
YTD
-3.24%
1Y
2.77%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
12.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPH.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJPH.L
iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
22.15%29.37%23.82%34.19%-4.30%11.94%9.27%15.94%-15.89%19.45%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-3.24%2.99%29.31%9.69%15.59%30.17%-0.64%6.71%9.11%11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPH.L and BRK-B is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012

0.28

The correlation between IJPH.L and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPH.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPH.L
IJPH.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPH.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJPH.LBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.04

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

0.23

+5.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.17

0.49

+17.68

IJPH.L vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPH.L and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJPH.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPH.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -37.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPH.L and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPH.LBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-37.92%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-11.88%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.95%

-17.26%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

-20.84%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-21.44%

-13.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-12.87%

+9.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-7.44%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

5.62%

-2.77%

Volatility

IJPH.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 5.10%. This indicates that IJPH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPH.LBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

5.10%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.78%

12.45%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.08%

15.99%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.22%

16.97%

+2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.92%

19.77%

-0.85%

Dividends

IJPH.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJPH.L nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IJPH.L and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPH.L and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer