PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPH.L vs. AGGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPH.L vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IJPH.L is traded in GBP, while AGGH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGGH values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPH.L achieves a 24.57% return, which is significantly higher than AGGH's 2.86% return.


IJPH.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
8.26%
YTD
24.57%
6M
24.64%
1Y
58.27%
3Y*
29.00%
5Y*
21.85%
10Y*
15.52%

AGGH

1D
0.95%
1M
2.47%
YTD
2.86%
6M
2.02%
1Y
9.74%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPH.L vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IJPH.L
iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
24.57%29.37%23.82%34.19%-0.43%
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
2.86%0.52%3.76%3.05%2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPH.L and AGGH is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

-0.16

The correlation between IJPH.L and AGGH shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (all time) to -0.01 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPH.L vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPH.L
IJPH.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGH
AGGH Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AGGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGH Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPH.L vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJPH.LAGGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.22

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.93

1.96

+3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.84

5.34

+15.50

IJPH.L vs. AGGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the AGGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPH.L and AGGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJPH.L vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPH.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -14.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPH.L and AGGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPH.LAGGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-14.96%

-19.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-4.93%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.95%

-11.61%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-3.11%

+2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-8.11%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

1.81%

+0.94%

Volatility

IJPH.L vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) at 1.16%. This indicates that IJPH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPH.LAGGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

1.16%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.89%

5.18%

+10.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

7.96%

+12.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.10%

10.90%

+8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

10.90%

+8.27%

IJPH.L vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJPH.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJPH.L vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison

IJPH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
7.50%7.54%8.97%9.51%2.11%
IJPH.L
iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJPH.L and AGGH have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGGH is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGGH is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.

IJPH.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IJPH.L and 0.33% for AGGH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPH.L and AGGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer