IJK vs. SLV
IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IJK is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJK returned 11.54%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for SLV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IJK charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IJK vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, IJK has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 11.54%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.
IJK
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 19.41%
- 6M
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- 30.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
SLV
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 29.40%
- 1Y
- 113.72%
- 3Y*
- 45.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.04%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
IJK vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 19.41% | 7.28% | 15.68% | 17.41% | -19.03% | 18.68% | 22.45% | 25.96% | -10.53% | 19.64% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 3.97% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJK and SLV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.21 |
IJK vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJK
SLV
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
IJK
SLV
-
Technology
IJK
SLV
-
Healthcare
IJK
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IJK
SLV
-
Financial Services
IJK
SLV
-
Real Estate
IJK
SLV
-
Energy
IJK
SLV
-
Basic Materials
IJK
SLV
Consumer Defensive
IJK
SLV
-
Utilities
IJK
SLV
-
Communication Services
IJK
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJK vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IJK
SLV
IJK vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.69 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | 5.76 | +6.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.94 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.58 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.49 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.25 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
IJK vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.47% | -76.28% | +21.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -42.45% | +32.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.63% | -42.45% | +16.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -42.45% | +13.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.25% | -42.81% | +3.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -36.57% | +36.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.80% | -44.67% | +33.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 19.81% | -17.30% |
Volatility
IJK vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) is 4.98%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that IJK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 16.34% | -11.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 58.31% | -45.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 58.90% | -41.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 36.15% | -15.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 31.83% | -10.77% |
IJK vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJK vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 1.09% | 1.13% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.12% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJK and SLV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to IJK (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.63% vs 11.54% for IJK. On fees, IJK is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, IJK has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.63% return vs 11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJK is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IJK has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IJK is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SLV is Silver. IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJK and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer