IJK vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - IJK tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index while QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index. Both are passively managed. IJK charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

IJK vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IJK

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -2.82%
• 6M: 11.34%
• YTD: 15.74%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: 13.85%
• 5Y*: 7.42%
• 10Y*: 10.87%
• ALL TIME*: 8.48%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF	$17.18M	$22.70M	$31.50M
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IJK vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF	11.00%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

IJK vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IJK	QQQN
Industrials	30.8%	8.7%
Technology	23.9%	47.3%
Healthcare	13.6%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	13.7%
Financial Services	6.7%	-
Real Estate	5.2%	-
Basic Materials	4.1%	1.9%
Energy	3.0%	-
Communication Services	2.2%	5.5%
Utilities	1.8%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	1.4%

Return for Risk

IJK vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IJK

IJK Risk / Return Rank: 54
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 46
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 64

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IJK vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IJK	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.75	—	—

Drawdowns

IJK vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IJK	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.47%	0.00%	-54.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.78%	0.00%	-4.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	0.00%	-10.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IJK	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.87%	0.00%	+17.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.78%	0.00%	+20.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.08%	0.00%	+21.08%

IJK vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IJK vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF	0.54%	0.66%	0.79%	1.13%	1.08%	0.50%	0.70%	1.09%	1.13%	0.93%	1.15%	1.12%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IJK or QQQN?

On fees, IJK is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IJK or QQQN?

IJK is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IJK or QQQN?

IJK has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between IJK and QQQN?

IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.18% for QQQN.