IJK vs. ACWI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).
IJK and ACWI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IJK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400/Citigroup Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. Both IJK and ACWI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IJK vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IJK vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 3.97% | 7.28% | 15.68% | 17.41% | -19.03% | 18.68% | 22.45% | 25.96% | -10.53% | 19.64% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | -2.21% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's -2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, IJK has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 10.44%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.58% annualized return.
IJK
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 5.26%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
ACWI
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IJK vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJK has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IJK vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
IJK
ACWI
IJK vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJK | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.20 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.77 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.79 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 8.26 | -1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJK | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.20 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.59 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.68 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.39 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between IJK and ACWI is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IJK vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than ACWI's 1.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 1.09% | 1.13% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.12% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.59% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
Drawdowns
IJK vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and ACWI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJK | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.47% | -56.00% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -11.76% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -26.42% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.25% | -33.53% | -5.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -6.92% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -8.69% | -2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.54% | +0.64% |
Volatility
IJK vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 6.38%. This indicates that IJK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IJK | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 6.38% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 10.05% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.37% | 17.48% | +4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 15.97% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 17.08% | +3.93% |