IJJ vs. IAU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IJJ (iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IJJ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJJ returned 10.32%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for IAU. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IJJ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.

Performance

IJJ vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJJ achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IJJ has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 10.32%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.

IJJ

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 6M: 9.26%
• 1Y: 20.64%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 7.43%
• 10Y*: 10.32%

IAU

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 2.98%
• 6M: 5.50%
• 1Y: 32.20%
• 3Y*: 31.29%
• 5Y*: 18.32%
• 10Y*: 13.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJJ vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF	8.95%	7.27%	11.63%	15.24%	-7.11%	30.45%	3.56%	25.66%	-12.06%	12.04%
IAU iShares Gold Trust	2.98%	63.95%	26.85%	12.84%	-0.63%	-4.00%	25.03%	17.98%	-1.76%	12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IJJ and IAU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005	0.07

The correlation between IJJ and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJJ vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IJJ	IAU
Financial Services	21.8%	-
Industrials	18.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	-
Real Estate	9.6%	100.0%
Technology	9.3%	-
Energy	7.4%	-
Basic Materials	6.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	-
Utilities	4.2%	-
Healthcare	3.5%	-
Communication Services	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

IJJ vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJJ

IJJ Risk / Return Rank: 38
IJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
IJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
IJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 41

IAU

IAU Risk / Return Rank: 32
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 36
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJJ vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IJJ	IAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.23	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	1.62	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.24	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	1.69	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	4.19	+2.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IJJ vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJJ and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IJJ	IAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	1.23	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	1.03	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.84	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.62	-0.15

Drawdowns

IJJ vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJJ drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJJ and IAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	IJJ	IAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.00%	-45.14%	-12.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.59%	-19.18%	+8.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.68%	-19.18%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.68%	-20.93%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.11%	-21.82%	-24.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-17.70%	+17.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	-15.96%	+8.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	7.71%	-4.65%

Volatility

IJJ vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) is 3.81%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that IJJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IJJ	IAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	5.50%	-1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	23.02%	-12.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.33%	26.42%	-11.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.57%	17.95%	+1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.04%	15.90%	+6.14%

IJJ vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJJ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IJJ vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

IJJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IAU iShares Gold Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF	1.64%	1.79%	1.81%	1.68%	1.97%	1.62%	1.78%	1.70%	2.01%	1.52%	1.67%	1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IJJ and IAU in my portfolio?

IJJ and IAU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IJJ or IAU?

IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to IJJ (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJJ dropped -58.00% vs IAU's -45.14%.

Which ETF is better, IJJ or IAU?

On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.31% vs 10.32% for IJJ. On fees, IJJ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IJJ or IAU?

Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IJJ or IAU?

IJJ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IJJ or IAU?

IJJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

What is the main difference between IJJ and IAU?

IJJ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while IAU is Gold. IJJ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJJ and 0.25% for IAU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.