PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJJ vs. IAAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJJ vs. IAAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IJJ having a 9.44% return and IAAAX slightly higher at 9.64%. Over the past 10 years, IJJ has underperformed IAAAX with an annualized return of 10.25%, while IAAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.


IJJ

1D
0.45%
1M
1.23%
YTD
9.44%
6M
9.54%
1Y
21.89%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
10.25%

IAAAX

1D
-0.64%
1M
3.92%
YTD
9.64%
6M
10.37%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
11.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJJ vs. IAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
9.44%7.27%11.63%15.24%-7.11%30.45%3.56%25.66%-12.06%12.04%
IAAAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund
9.64%21.45%17.37%20.04%-19.24%16.14%18.87%21.75%-11.48%20.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IJJ and IAAAX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2002

0.84

The correlation between IJJ and IAAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJJ vs. IAAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJJ
IJJ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IAAAX
IAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJJ vs. IAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJJIAAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.63

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

11.76

-4.59

IJJ vs. IAAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the IAAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJJ and IAAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJJIAAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.99

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.59

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.66

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.42

+0.05

Drawdowns

IJJ vs. IAAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJJ drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, roughly equal to the maximum IAAAX drawdown of -56.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJJ and IAAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJJIAAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.00%

-56.57%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-9.85%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.68%

-17.90%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.68%

-29.29%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.11%

-35.34%

-10.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.64%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-9.53%

+1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.20%

+0.86%

Volatility

IJJ vs. IAAAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX) at 3.39%. This indicates that IJJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJJIAAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.39%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

10.13%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

13.01%

+2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.57%

16.33%

+3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

16.85%

+5.18%

IJJ vs. IAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJJ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IAAAX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJJ vs. IAAAX - Dividend Comparison

IJJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than IAAAX's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAAAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund
6.58%7.21%5.16%2.79%8.74%8.25%4.13%9.02%19.05%11.01%8.16%9.44%
IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.63%1.79%1.81%1.68%1.97%1.62%1.78%1.70%2.01%1.52%1.67%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJJ and IAAAX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJJ has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to IAAAX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJJ dropped -58.00% vs IAAAX's -56.57%.

IAAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJJ and IAAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer