IJJ vs. BSVO
IJJ (iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJJ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while BSVO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bridgeway. IJJ is passively managed, while BSVO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IJJ returned 14.45%/yr vs 19.99%/yr for BSVO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJJ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for BSVO.
Performance
IJJ vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJJ achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 20.22% return.
IJJ
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 21.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
BSVO
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 20.22%
- 6M
- 19.77%
- 1Y
- 45.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IJJ vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 9.44% | 7.27% | 11.63% | 17.02% |
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 20.22% | 9.21% | 4.68% | 22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJJ and BSVO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IJJ and BSVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJJ vs. BSVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJJ
BSVO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IJJ
BSVO
Industrials
IJJ
BSVO
Consumer Cyclical
IJJ
BSVO
Real Estate
IJJ
BSVO
Technology
IJJ
BSVO
Energy
IJJ
BSVO
Basic Materials
IJJ
BSVO
Consumer Defensive
IJJ
BSVO
Utilities
IJJ
BSVO
-
Healthcare
IJJ
BSVO
Communication Services
IJJ
BSVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJJ vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank
IJJ
BSVO
IJJ vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJJ | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.42 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 5.47 | -3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.17 | 15.58 | -8.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJJ | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.41 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.81 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
IJJ vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJJ drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than BSVO's maximum drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJJ and BSVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJJ | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.00% | -28.67% | -29.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -8.31% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.68% | -28.67% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -5.72% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.91% | +0.15% |
Volatility
IJJ vs. BSVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) is 3.70%, while EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that IJJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJJ | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 4.83% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.65% | 12.07% | -1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 18.88% | -3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 21.73% | -2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 21.73% | +0.30% |
IJJ vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJJ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJJ vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison
IJJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than BSVO's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.26% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.79% | 1.81% | 1.68% | 1.97% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.70% | 2.01% | 1.52% | 1.67% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJJ and BSVO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSVO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to IJJ (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJJ dropped -58.00% vs BSVO's -28.67%.
On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 19.99% vs 14.45% for IJJ. On fees, IJJ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 14.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJJ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.
IJJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.26% for BSVO.
IJJ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while BSVO is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJJ and 0.47% for BSVO.
BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJJ and BSVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer