PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIVAX vs. GTTMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IIVAX vs. GTTMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (IIVAX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIVAX achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly lower than GTTMX's 13.29% return. Over the past 10 years, IIVAX has underperformed GTTMX with an annualized return of 10.02%, while GTTMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.36% annualized return.


IIVAX

1D
0.21%
1M
2.25%
YTD
10.90%
6M
11.33%
1Y
23.71%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
10.02%

GTTMX

1D
0.49%
1M
5.06%
YTD
13.29%
6M
15.08%
1Y
29.10%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIVAX vs. GTTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IIVAX
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
10.90%9.49%8.57%12.02%-8.35%27.49%3.25%24.62%-11.87%15.16%
GTTMX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio
13.29%18.40%14.84%9.39%-13.90%41.28%5.12%24.18%-11.99%22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between IIVAX and GTTMX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.90

The correlation between IIVAX and GTTMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIVAX vs. GTTMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIVAX
IIVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IIVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IIVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

GTTMX
GTTMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GTTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIVAX vs. GTTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (IIVAX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IIVAXGTTMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

4.64

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

15.63

-5.77

IIVAX vs. GTTMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the GTTMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIVAX and GTTMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IIVAXGTTMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.04

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.56

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.61

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.42

+0.08

Drawdowns

IIVAX vs. GTTMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIVAX drawdown since its inception was -57.38%, roughly equal to the maximum GTTMX drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIVAX and GTTMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIVAXGTTMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.38%

-56.24%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-6.51%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.76%

-20.62%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.12%

-24.12%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.13%

-44.59%

+0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-10.25%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.92%

+0.64%

Volatility

IIVAX vs. GTTMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (IIVAX) is 3.06%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that IIVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTTMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIVAXGTTMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

3.96%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

10.84%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.60%

14.84%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.58%

18.32%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

20.50%

-0.02%

IIVAX vs. GTTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIVAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than GTTMX's 1.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

IIVAX vs. GTTMX - Dividend Comparison

IIVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, less than GTTMX's 16.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTTMX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio
16.64%18.85%14.45%5.83%0.40%17.50%11.58%5.95%9.88%3.00%0.55%0.59%
IIVAX
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
9.54%10.58%12.75%4.83%9.72%10.94%0.48%3.17%12.58%13.20%5.91%9.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


IIVAX and GTTMX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTTMX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to IIVAX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIVAX dropped -57.38% vs GTTMX's -56.24%.

GTTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIVAX and GTTMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer