PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTTMX vs. GTCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTTMX vs. GTCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) and Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio (GTCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTTMX achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than GTCIX's 13.85% return. Over the past 10 years, GTTMX has outperformed GTCIX with an annualized return of 12.36%, while GTCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.


GTTMX

1D
1.27%
1M
4.00%
6M
11.49%
YTD
14.75%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
12.36%
ALL TIME*
8.86%

GTCIX

1D
0.87%
1M
3.03%
6M
8.18%
YTD
13.85%
1Y
30.77%
3Y*
21.24%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
9.65%
ALL TIME*
5.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GTTMX vs. GTCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTTMX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio
14.75%18.40%14.84%9.39%-13.90%41.28%5.12%24.18%-11.99%22.88%
GTCIX
Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio
13.85%39.90%8.60%19.16%-11.88%12.56%1.86%18.00%-16.26%22.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GTTMX and GTCIX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between GTTMX and GTCIX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTTMX vs. GTCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTTMX
GTTMX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GTTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

GTCIX
GTCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GTCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GTCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTTMX vs. GTCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) and Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio (GTCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTTMXGTCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.50

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

3.28

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

11.44

+2.27

GTTMX vs. GTCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTTMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the GTCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTTMX and GTCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTTMX vs. GTCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTTMX drawdown since its inception was -56.24%, smaller than the maximum GTCIX drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTTMX and GTCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTTMXGTCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.24%

-63.63%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.51%

-9.63%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.62%

-13.06%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

-26.23%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

-39.50%

-5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.18%

-13.07%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.75%

-0.78%

Volatility

GTTMX vs. GTCIX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio (GTCIX) at 2.73%. This indicates that GTTMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTTMXGTCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

2.73%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

9.44%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

11.66%

+3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

13.41%

+4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

14.96%

+5.52%

GTTMX vs. GTCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTTMX has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than GTCIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTTMX vs. GTCIX - Dividend Comparison

GTTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.47%, more than GTCIX's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTCIX
Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio
4.62%4.50%9.25%2.75%3.14%3.09%2.08%2.95%2.62%1.75%1.83%0.71%
GTTMX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio
16.47%18.85%14.45%5.83%0.40%17.50%11.58%5.95%9.88%3.00%0.55%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTTMX and GTCIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTTMX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to GTCIX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTTMX dropped -56.24% vs GTCIX's -63.63%.

GTCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTTMX and GTCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer