IISU.L vs. XLBP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IISU.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XLBP.L (Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - IISU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index while XLBP.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IISU.L returned 13.38%/yr vs 6.07%/yr for XLBP.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IISU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLBP.L.

Performance

IISU.L vs. XLBP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) and Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IISU.L having a 12.64% return and XLBP.L slightly higher at 12.87%.

IISU.L

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 12.64%
• 6M: 13.00%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 13.38%
• 10Y*: —

XLBP.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 12.87%
• 6M: 15.50%
• 1Y: 20.26%
• 3Y*: 8.27%
• 5Y*: 6.07%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IISU.L vs. XLBP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IISU.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	12.64%	11.24%	19.29%	11.45%	6.06%	22.20%	6.25%	24.46%	-9.19%	7.89%
XLBP.L Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF	12.87%	3.47%	0.77%	6.09%	-1.67%	28.80%	15.99%	19.70%	-9.97%	10.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IISU.L and XLBP.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between IISU.L and XLBP.L has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IISU.L vs. XLBP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IISU.L	XLBP.L
Industrials	90.4%	1.6%
Utilities	4.9%	-
Technology	3.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.5%	8.6%
Basic Materials	0.2%	89.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

IISU.L vs. XLBP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IISU.L

IISU.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
IISU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IISU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
IISU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
IISU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IISU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

XLBP.L

XLBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 38
XLBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
XLBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
XLBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
XLBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XLBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IISU.L vs. XLBP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) and Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IISU.L	XLBP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.35	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	1.94	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.23	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	1.86	+0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.22	6.29	+1.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IISU.L vs. XLBP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IISU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the XLBP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IISU.L and XLBP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IISU.L	XLBP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	1.35	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.37	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.56	+0.07

Drawdowns

IISU.L vs. XLBP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IISU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, which is greater than XLBP.L's maximum drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IISU.L and XLBP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IISU.L	XLBP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.66%	-28.58%	-6.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-10.74%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.12%	-21.98%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.12%	-21.98%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-3.23%	+1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.51%	-5.53%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	3.18%	-0.23%

Volatility

IISU.L vs. XLBP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) is 4.54%, while Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that IISU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLBP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IISU.L	XLBP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	5.17%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.37%	11.95%	-1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.25%	14.85%	-1.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.96%	16.38%	-0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.65%	18.20%	+0.45%

IISU.L vs. XLBP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IISU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLBP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IISU.L vs. XLBP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IISU.L nor XLBP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IISU.L and XLBP.L in my portfolio?

IISU.L and XLBP.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IISU.L or XLBP.L?

On fees, XLBP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IISU.L or XLBP.L?

XLBP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IISU.L.

What is the main difference between IISU.L and XLBP.L?

IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while XLBP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IISU.L and 0.14% for XLBP.L.