IIRLX vs. FLCKX
IIRLX (Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio) and FLCKX (Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IIRLX returned 16.29%/yr vs 16.64%/yr for FLCKX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IIRLX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FLCKX.
Performance
IIRLX vs. FLCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIRLX achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than FLCKX's 27.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IIRLX having a 16.29% annualized return and FLCKX not far ahead at 16.64%.
IIRLX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 7.53%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.29%
FLCKX
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 27.04%
- 6M
- 25.37%
- 1Y
- 44.85%
- 3Y*
- 29.90%
- 5Y*
- 15.42%
- 10Y*
- 16.64%
IIRLX vs. FLCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIRLX Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio | 8.47% | 18.77% | 26.95% | 29.41% | -20.07% | 27.26% | 21.71% | 31.18% | -3.45% | 22.58% |
FLCKX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K | 27.04% | 20.45% | 27.06% | 26.21% | -22.91% | 26.19% | 26.85% | 35.76% | -16.34% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIRLX and FLCKX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IIRLX and FLCKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIRLX vs. FLCKX — Risk / Return Rank
IIRLX
FLCKX
IIRLX vs. FLCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IIRLX | FLCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 3.59 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.29 | 13.05 | -0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IIRLX vs. FLCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIRLX drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, smaller than the maximum FLCKX drawdown of -69.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIRLX and FLCKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIRLX | FLCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.33% | -69.99% | +19.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | -13.03% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.58% | -28.52% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.83% | -28.52% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.60% | -44.10% | +11.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | 0.00% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -12.39% | +5.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 3.57% | -1.31% |
Volatility
IIRLX vs. FLCKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) is 4.84%, while Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that IIRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIRLX | FLCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 9.06% | -4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.51% | 18.28% | -6.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.24% | 22.29% | -8.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 23.09% | -5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 23.52% | -4.95% |
IIRLX vs. FLCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIRLX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCKX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIRLX vs. FLCKX - Dividend Comparison
IIRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than FLCKX's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCKX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K | 3.69% | 4.69% | 14.54% | 12.22% | 18.51% | 8.45% | 0.19% | 0.14% | 19.95% | 18.97% | 27.57% | 6.18% |
IIRLX Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio | 4.88% | 3.76% | 0.96% | 1.14% | 5.04% | 4.77% | 4.71% | 4.35% | 1.73% | 1.47% | 1.77% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIRLX and FLCKX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCKX has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to IIRLX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIRLX dropped -50.33% vs FLCKX's -69.99%.
FLCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IIRLX and FLCKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer