PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCKX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCKX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCKX achieves a 21.12% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 17.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCKX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 15.41%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.79% annualized return.


FLCKX

1D
0.98%
1M
6.09%
YTD
21.12%
6M
21.47%
1Y
43.57%
3Y*
28.91%
5Y*
14.35%
10Y*
15.41%

FBGRX

1D
0.86%
1M
8.31%
YTD
17.66%
6M
18.83%
1Y
45.12%
3Y*
32.21%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
21.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCKX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCKX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K
21.12%20.45%27.06%26.21%-22.91%26.19%26.85%35.76%-16.34%20.95%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
17.66%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%33.43%1.02%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCKX and FBGRX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.89

The correlation between FLCKX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCKX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCKX
FLCKX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FLCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCKX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCKXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

2.67

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

3.42

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.62

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.57

15.38

-2.81

FLCKX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCKX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCKXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.67

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.67

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.92

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.68

-0.29

Drawdowns

FLCKX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCKX drawdown since its inception was -69.99%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCKX and FBGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCKXFBGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.99%

-58.64%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-12.65%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.52%

-27.07%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.52%

-43.08%

+14.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.10%

-43.08%

-1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.42%

-12.53%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

2.98%

+0.54%

Volatility

FLCKX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 4.14%. This indicates that FLCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCKXFBGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

4.14%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

12.99%

+3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.89%

17.46%

+3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.80%

24.88%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.38%

23.69%

-0.31%

FLCKX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCKX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FLCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than FBGRX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.61%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%
FLCKX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K
3.87%4.69%14.54%12.22%18.51%8.45%0.19%0.14%19.95%18.97%27.57%6.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCKX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCKX has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to FBGRX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCKX dropped -69.99% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCKX and FBGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer