III vs. LYG
III (Information Services Group, Inc.) and LYG (Lloyds Banking Group plc) are both stocks. III operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while LYG operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, III returned 3.36%/yr vs 12.99%/yr for LYG. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
III vs. LYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, III achieves a -26.41% return, which is significantly lower than LYG's 19.27% return. Over the past 10 years, III has underperformed LYG with an annualized return of 3.36%, while LYG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.
III
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- 6M
- -23.64%
- YTD
- -26.41%
- 1Y
- 2.94%
- 3Y*
- -2.77%
- 5Y*
- -3.55%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.77%
LYG
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 19.27%
- 1Y
- 47.19%
- 3Y*
- 47.39%
- 5Y*
- 25.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $778.93K | $750.93K | $1.04M | |
| $101.57M | $99.91M | $119.79M |
III vs. LYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
III Information Services Group, Inc. | -26.41% | 79.78% | -25.34% | 6.17% | -38.12% | 135.39% | 29.64% | -40.33% | 1.68% | 14.56% |
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 19.27% | 103.71% | 20.30% | 14.68% | -9.47% | 33.81% | -40.79% | 36.81% | -28.35% | 30.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between III and LYG is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2007 | 0.19 |
The correlation between III and LYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
III:
$199.01M
LYG:
$89.56B
III:
$0.21
LYG:
£0.34
III:
19.82
LYG:
13.54
III:
0.65
LYG:
6.77
III:
0.85
LYG:
1.05
III:
2.22
LYG:
1.46
III:
$246.33M
LYG:
£65.45B
III:
$75.21M
LYG:
£65.45B
III:
$22.27M
LYG:
£7.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
III vs. LYG — Risk / Return Rank
III
LYG
III vs. LYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Information Services Group, Inc. (III) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| III | LYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.30 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 2.30 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 6.18 | -6.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
III vs. LYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum III drawdown since its inception was -88.55%, smaller than the maximum LYG drawdown of -94.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for III and LYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| III | LYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.55% | -94.84% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.63% | -22.72% | -14.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.29% | -22.72% | -19.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.71% | -40.19% | -26.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.72% | -68.72% | -1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.08% | -50.71% | +2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.03% | -63.35% | +10.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.56% | 8.45% | +13.11% |
Volatility
III vs. LYG - Volatility Comparison
Information Services Group, Inc. (III) has a higher volatility of 11.47% compared to Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) at 10.40%. This indicates that III's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| III | LYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.47% | 10.40% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.58% | 24.44% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.61% | 29.33% | +10.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.22% | 32.12% | +9.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.48% | 34.82% | +10.66% |
Dividends
III vs. LYG - Dividend Comparison
III's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than LYG's 3.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
III Information Services Group, Inc. | 4.33% | 3.11% | 5.39% | 3.72% | 3.26% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.87% |
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 3.23% | 3.19% | 5.44% | 5.23% | 4.92% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 5.04% | 6.63% | 6.81% | 5.17% | 2.11% |
Financials
III vs. LYG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Information Services Group, Inc. and Lloyds Banking Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
III vs. LYG - Profitability Comparison
III - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Information Services Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 61.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LYG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 13.84B and revenue of 13.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
III - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Information Services Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.02M and revenue of 61.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.
LYG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 2.27B and revenue of 13.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
III - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Information Services Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.72M and revenue of 61.18M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
LYG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.53B and revenue of 13.84B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
III and LYG have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
III has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to LYG (10.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, III dropped -88.55% vs LYG's -94.84%.
LYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for III and LYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer