PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
III vs. AMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

III vs. AMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Information Services Group, Inc. (III) and Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, III achieves a -24.20% return, which is significantly lower than AMG's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, III has underperformed AMG with an annualized return of 3.27%, while AMG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.50% annualized return.


III

1D
-4.42%
1M
5.10%
YTD
-24.20%
6M
-21.85%
1Y
-7.29%
3Y*
-1.77%
5Y*
-1.72%
10Y*
3.27%

AMG

1D
0.35%
1M
4.74%
YTD
8.10%
6M
14.76%
1Y
72.82%
3Y*
28.70%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

III vs. AMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
III
Information Services Group, Inc.
-24.20%79.78%-25.34%6.17%-38.12%135.39%29.64%-40.33%1.68%14.56%
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
8.10%55.93%22.15%-4.40%-3.67%61.80%20.53%-11.79%-52.15%41.93%

Correlation

The correlation between III and AMG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2007

0.25

The correlation between III and AMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

III:

$217.26M

AMG:

$8.57B

EPS

III:

$0.21

AMG:

$24.29

PE Ratio

III:

20.61

AMG:

12.83

PEG Ratio

III:

0.67

AMG:

0.42

PS Ratio

III:

0.88

AMG:

4.09

PB Ratio

III:

2.31

AMG:

2.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

III:

$246.33M

AMG:

$2.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

III:

$75.21M

AMG:

$1.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

III:

$22.27M

AMG:

$1.53B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

III vs. AMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

III
III Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
III Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
III Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
III Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
III Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
III Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AMG
AMG Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

III vs. AMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Information Services Group, Inc. (III) and Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IIIAMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.42

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

3.71

-3.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

10.59

-10.99

III vs. AMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current III Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the AMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of III and AMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IIIAMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

2.43

-2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.42

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.19

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.25

-0.29

Drawdowns

III vs. AMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum III drawdown since its inception was -88.55%, roughly equal to the maximum AMG drawdown of -85.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for III and AMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIIAMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.55%

-85.92%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.63%

-19.72%

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.01%

-26.97%

-21.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.71%

-41.22%

-25.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.72%

-78.52%

+8.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.52%

-5.78%

-40.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.07%

-24.73%

-28.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.07%

6.90%

+11.17%

Volatility

III vs. AMG - Volatility Comparison

Information Services Group, Inc. (III) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) at 6.76%. This indicates that III's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIIAMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.01%

6.76%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.88%

24.63%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.98%

30.12%

+9.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.17%

32.25%

+8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.49%

34.66%

+10.83%

Dividends

III vs. AMG - Dividend Comparison

III's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than AMG's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
0.01%0.01%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.34%1.51%1.23%0.39%0.00%0.00%
III
Information Services Group, Inc.
4.16%3.11%5.39%3.72%3.26%1.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.87%

Financials

III vs. AMG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Information Services Group, Inc. and Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
61.18M
544.90M
(III) Total Revenue
(AMG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

III vs. AMG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Information Services Group, Inc. and Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
81.0%
Portfolio components
III - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Information Services Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 61.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 441.50M and revenue of 544.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

III - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Information Services Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.02M and revenue of 61.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

AMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 77.40M and revenue of 544.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

III - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Information Services Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.72M and revenue of 61.18M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

AMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. reported a net income of 110.40M and revenue of 544.90M, resulting in a net margin of 20.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


III and AMG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

III has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to AMG (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, III dropped -88.55% vs AMG's -85.92%.

AMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for III and AMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer