PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
III.TO vs. ATZ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

III.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Imperial Metals Corporation (III.TO) and Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, III.TO achieves a -30.80% return, which is significantly lower than ATZ.TO's 36.63% return.


III.TO

1D
-3.08%
1M
7.79%
YTD
-30.80%
6M
-10.48%
1Y
43.57%
3Y*
54.95%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
1.85%

ATZ.TO

1D
1.36%
1M
14.94%
YTD
36.63%
6M
45.10%
1Y
135.41%
3Y*
63.82%
5Y*
39.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

III.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corporation
-30.80%449.45%-16.51%20.44%-42.90%-37.84%147.57%32.90%-54.28%-44.06%
ATZ.TO
Aritzia Inc.
36.63%119.59%94.33%-41.92%-9.55%102.99%35.38%16.16%29.24%-27.49%

Correlation

The correlation between III.TO and ATZ.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016

0.10

The correlation between III.TO and ATZ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

III.TO:

CA$1.28B

ATZ.TO:

CA$19.27B

EPS

III.TO:

CA$0.71

ATZ.TO:

CA$3.19

PE Ratio

III.TO:

9.72

ATZ.TO:

50.25

PEG Ratio

III.TO:

0.41

ATZ.TO:

1.00

PS Ratio

III.TO:

1.84

ATZ.TO:

5.18

PB Ratio

III.TO:

1.23

ATZ.TO:

14.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

III.TO:

CA$669.73M

ATZ.TO:

CA$3.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

III.TO:

CA$265.84M

ATZ.TO:

CA$1.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

III.TO:

CA$351.88M

ATZ.TO:

CA$736.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

III.TO vs. ATZ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

III.TO
III.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
III.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
III.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
III.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
III.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
III.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ATZ.TO
ATZ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

III.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Metals Corporation (III.TO) and Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


III.TOATZ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.53

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

5.87

-5.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.77

16.59

-14.82

III.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current III.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of III.TO and ATZ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


III.TOATZ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

3.68

-2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.86

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.60

-0.58

Drawdowns

III.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum III.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.92%, which is greater than ATZ.TO's maximum drawdown of -64.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for III.TO and ATZ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


III.TOATZ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.92%

-64.82%

-34.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.57%

-23.22%

-31.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.57%

-46.84%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.20%

-64.82%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.27%

0.00%

-62.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.48%

-20.16%

-39.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.73%

8.19%

+16.54%

Volatility

III.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Imperial Metals Corporation (III.TO) has a higher volatility of 20.78% compared to Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) at 12.91%. This indicates that III.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATZ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


III.TOATZ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.78%

12.91%

+7.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.67%

30.48%

+16.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.50%

37.09%

+21.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.65%

46.72%

+5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.51%

43.04%

+19.47%

Dividends

III.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither III.TO nor ATZ.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

III.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Metals Corporation and Aritzia Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
154.57M
1.19B
(III.TO) Total Revenue
(ATZ.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

III.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Imperial Metals Corporation and Aritzia Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
28.9%
42.8%
Portfolio components
III.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Metals Corporation reported a gross profit of 44.67M and revenue of 154.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.

ATZ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a gross profit of 507.19M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.

III.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Metals Corporation reported an operating income of 40.20M and revenue of 154.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.

ATZ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported an operating income of 183.02M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

III.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Metals Corporation reported a net income of 14.40M and revenue of 154.57M, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.

ATZ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a net income of 134.27M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


III.TO and ATZ.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for III.TO and ATZ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer