PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
III.L vs. RL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

III.L vs. RL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in 3I Group plc (III.L) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

III.L is traded in GBp, while RL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, III.L achieves a -29.24% return, which is significantly lower than RL's 15.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with III.L having a 19.84% annualized return and RL not far behind at 18.96%.


III.L

1D
3.78%
1M
-4.63%
YTD
-29.24%
6M
-26.18%
1Y
-43.66%
3Y*
7.01%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
19.84%

RL

1D
2.81%
1M
22.89%
YTD
15.14%
6M
9.42%
1Y
55.38%
3Y*
49.05%
5Y*
30.91%
10Y*
18.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

III.L vs. RL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
III.L
3I Group plc
-29.24%-6.44%50.11%85.46%-3.46%28.99%9.36%47.12%-11.76%33.70%
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
15.14%43.98%65.70%32.83%2.48%17.76%-13.25%11.65%7.85%7.37%

Correlation

The correlation between III.L and RL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

III.L:

£23.50B

RL:

$25.17B

EPS

III.L:

£10.41

RL:

$15.08

PE Ratio

III.L:

2.22

RL:

26.79

PEG Ratio

III.L:

0.27

RL:

1.49

PS Ratio

III.L:

10.82

RL:

3.11

PB Ratio

III.L:

0.76

RL:

8.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

III.L:

£2.12B

RL:

$8.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

III.L:

£5.57B

RL:

$5.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

III.L:

£9.82B

RL:

$1.18B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

III.L vs. RL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

III.L
III.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
III.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
III.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
III.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
III.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
III.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

RL
RL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

III.L vs. RL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3I Group plc (III.L) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


III.LRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.28

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

3.30

-4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.63

9.93

-11.56

III.L vs. RL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current III.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the RL Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of III.L and RL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

III.L vs. RL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum III.L drawdown since its inception was -84.90%, which is greater than RL's maximum drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for III.L and RL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


III.LRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.90%

-56.24%

-28.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.78%

-16.86%

-35.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.78%

-37.04%

-15.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.78%

-37.04%

-15.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.78%

-52.58%

-0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.63%

0.00%

-47.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.08%

-20.78%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.82%

5.59%

+21.23%

Volatility

III.L vs. RL - Volatility Comparison

3I Group plc (III.L) has a higher volatility of 19.01% compared to Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) at 15.94%. This indicates that III.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


III.LRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.01%

15.94%

+3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.16%

26.80%

+10.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.35%

34.14%

+9.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.78%

36.12%

-5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.35%

38.27%

-7.92%

Dividends

III.L vs. RL - Dividend Comparison

III.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than RL's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
III.L
3I Group plc
3.42%2.42%1.82%2.32%3.76%2.78%3.02%3.42%4.78%2.90%3.41%2.37%
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
0.90%1.01%1.40%2.08%2.78%1.74%0.66%2.29%2.30%1.93%2.21%1.79%

Financials

III.L vs. RL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3I Group plc and Ralph Lauren Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
236.00M
1.98B
(III.L) Total Revenue
(RL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. III.L values in GBP, RL values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


III.L and RL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for III.L and RL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer