IHI vs. PJP
IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) and PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IHI tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index while PJP tracks the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHI returned 9.29%/yr vs 7.80%/yr for PJP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PJP.
Performance
IHI vs. PJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHI achieves a -19.12% return, which is significantly lower than PJP's 11.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IHI has outperformed PJP with an annualized return of 9.29%, while PJP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.80% annualized return.
IHI
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- -19.12%
- 6M
- -19.87%
- 1Y
- -18.46%
- 3Y*
- -2.75%
- 5Y*
- -3.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.29%
PJP
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 6.94%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 45.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
IHI vs. PJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -19.12% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 11.27% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 14.58% | 11.29% | 4.64% | -1.78% | 15.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHI and PJP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IHI and PJP has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IHI vs. PJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHI
PJP
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IHI
PJP
Industrials
IHI
PJP
-
Basic Materials
IHI
-
PJP
-
Communication Services
IHI
-
PJP
-
Consumer Cyclical
IHI
-
PJP
-
Consumer Defensive
IHI
-
PJP
-
Energy
IHI
-
PJP
-
Financial Services
IHI
-
PJP
Real Estate
IHI
-
PJP
-
Technology
IHI
-
PJP
-
Utilities
IHI
-
PJP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHI vs. PJP — Risk / Return Rank
IHI
PJP
IHI vs. PJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHI | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.46 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 4.86 | -5.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 15.42 | -17.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHI vs. PJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHI drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, which is greater than PJP's maximum drawdown of -37.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHI and PJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHI | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.65% | -37.06% | -12.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | -9.44% | -16.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -16.27% | -10.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.12% | -17.51% | -15.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | -33.95% | +0.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.63% | 0.00% | -23.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.36% | -8.83% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.61% | 2.97% | +8.64% |
Volatility
IHI vs. PJP - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) at 5.34%. This indicates that IHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHI | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 5.34% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 12.42% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 16.54% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 16.19% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 18.37% | +1.44% |
IHI vs. PJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PJP's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHI vs. PJP - Dividend Comparison
IHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than PJP's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.48% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHI and PJP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to PJP (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHI dropped -49.65% vs PJP's -37.06%.
On 10-year performance, IHI leads with 9.29% vs 7.80% for PJP. On fees, IHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IHI has performed better with a 9.29% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.
PJP has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.48% for IHI.
IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IHI and 0.58% for PJP.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHI and PJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer