IHF vs. TRUH
IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. IHF is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IHF charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
IHF vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IHF
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 25.51%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 1Y
- 40.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.87%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $31.65M | $27.11M | $26.74M | |
| $24.34K | $32.62K | $24.57K |
IHF vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 35.00% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHF and TRUH is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHF vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
IHF
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IHF vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHF | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.71 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHF vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHF drawdown since its inception was -58.42%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHF and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHF | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.42% | -4.51% | -53.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -2.99% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.59% | -1.66% | -8.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.18% | — | — |
Volatility
IHF vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHF | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.35% | 17.52% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 17.52% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 17.52% | +3.52% |
IHF vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHF has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHF vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
IHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 0.92% | 1.05% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 4.01% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.20% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHF and TRUH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IHF.
IHF has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IHF and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for IHF and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer