PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TRUH vs. FHLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TRUH vs. FHLC

Last updated Jul 21, 2026
Documentation

TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) and FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep.

Performance

TRUH vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

TRUH

1D
-1.18%
1M
6.79%
6M
—
YTD
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

FHLC

1D
-1.22%
1M
7.21%
6M
4.29%
YTD
4.96%
1Y
25.39%
3Y*
7.75%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*
9.68%
ALL TIME*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUH vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
TRUH
VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF		8.59%
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF		9.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUH and FHLC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF

Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

Often compared with TRUH:
TRUH vs. MHIPTRUH vs. FTXHTRUH vs. GSKHTRUH vs. HODLTRUH vs. SBIOTRUH vs. BIZDTRUH vs. CNCR
Often compared with FHLC:
FHLC vs. VHTFHLC vs. XLVFHLC vs. FSPHXFHLC vs. IHIFHLC vs. FSHCXFHLC vs. VOOFHLC vs. IXJ

Return for Risk

TRUH vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TRUH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FHLC
FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRUH vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TRUHFHLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.66

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.57

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.29

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

2.46

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

6.06

—

TRUH vs. FHLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRUH vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUH drawdown since its inception was -4.51%, smaller than the maximum FHLC drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUH and FHLC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TRUHFHLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-28.76%

+24.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-10.38%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-16.87%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-17.73%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-28.76%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.25%

-3.39%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-5.17%

+3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

4.20%

—

Volatility

TRUH vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TRUHFHLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

5.87%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

11.57%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

15.35%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

15.21%

+2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

16.87%

+0.71%

Dividends

TRUH vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

TRUH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than FHLC's 1.32% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF		1.32%1.40%1.51%1.40%1.30%1.16%1.45%1.18%1.38%1.38%1.40%2.07%
TRUH
VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF		0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.98, TRUH and FHLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.31% for TRUH.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Fidelity.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRUH and FHLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer