IHF vs. PBPH
IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IHF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IHF charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
IHF vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHF achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's 2.63% return.
IHF
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 12.02%
- 1Y
- 14.30%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IHF vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 11.55% | -0.10% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 2.63% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHF and PBPH is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHF vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
IHF
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IHF vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHF | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHF vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHF drawdown since its inception was -58.42%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHF and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHF | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.42% | -11.10% | -47.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | -5.21% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -4.36% | -6.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.51% | — | — |
Volatility
IHF vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHF | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.90% | 17.07% | +4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 17.07% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 17.07% | +3.95% |
IHF vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHF has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHF vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
IHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 4.01% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.20% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHF and PBPH have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IHF.
IHF has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
IHF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IHF and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for IHF and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer