IGTR vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

IGTR (Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGTR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGTR charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

IGTR vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGTR achieves a 18.68% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

IGTR

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 15.84%
• YTD: 18.68%
• 1Y: 37.98%
• 3Y*: 15.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGTR vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IGTR Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF	18.68%	1.55%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IGTR and POW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

IGTR vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGTR

IGTR Risk / Return Rank: 60
IGTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
IGTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
IGTR Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IGTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
IGTR Martin Ratio Rank: 67

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGTR vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGTR	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.52	—	—

Drawdowns

IGTR vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGTR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGTR and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGTR	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.06%	-18.37%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.51%	-18.37%	+9.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.95%	-4.33%	-2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.85%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IGTR	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.08%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.41%	32.94%	-6.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.17%	32.94%	-13.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.17%	32.94%	-13.77%

IGTR vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGTR has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGTR vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

IGTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IGTR Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF	0.67%	0.80%	2.40%	0.87%	0.31%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGTR and POW in my portfolio?

IGTR and POW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IGTR or POW?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGTR or POW?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IGTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGTR or POW?

IGTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between IGTR and POW?

IGTR is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IGTR and 0.75% for POW.